Should universities be held legally accountable when staff are accused of misconduct and leadership fails to act?
New Sexual Misconduct Allegations Emerge Against Ex-Indiana Team Doctor
A growing number of former Indiana University men's basketball players—now at least 15—have alleged inappropriate sexual conduct by longtime team physician Dr. Bradford Bomba. The players say Bomba conducted unnecessary and invasive rectal exams under the guise of physicals, despite these procedures not being medically indicated. More troublingly, the lawsuit claims that key university figures, including legendary coach Bobby Knight and athletic trainer Tim Garl, were aware of the misconduct but failed to intervene. Although Bomba has since died, the issue has reignited concerns about athlete safety and institutional accountability. IU maintains that an earlier review found Bomba’s exams to be "clinically appropriate," but the plaintiffs dispute that, pushing for changes and accountability. This legal battle also confronts Indiana's statute of limitations, which may hinder civil claims. The case underscores a broader reckoning within collegiate athletics over abuse, trust, and oversight.
Options
- Yes, they have a duty to protect students
- No, only individuals should be liable
- Depends on what they knew
- Not sure